Umtoquedemotivacao

Subway’s tuna does not have tuna DNA, according to research by The New York Instances

There are even now lots of uncertainties about it, but for the instant that was the result of the tests carried out by the medium.

Obtain Your Best Franchise

Full our brief franchise quiz to find out the franchise which is right for you.




2 min go through

This report was translated from our Spanish edition employing AI technologies. Errors might exist owing to this method.


The New York Periods executed an investigation that disclosed that the tuna from the quickly meals chain, Subway in California, United States, is not basically tuna. Tests by a private laboratory established that there was no DNA of this species in the product or service.

In late January, The Washington Publish noted a lawsuit from the sandwich chain, which alleged that Subway’s food stuff lacked tuna or was built from just about anything but fish.

The model denied these allegations in an electronic mail despatched to The New York Occasions , and discussed that it delivers 100% cooked tuna to its dining places, which is mixed with mayonnaise and included to their foods.

Even so, a reporter from the US media collected some tuna from some franchise establishments in California and sent them to a private laboratory for inspection, which chosen to continue to be anonymous.

Image: Subway via Facebook .

The take a look at results showed that no DNA was uncovered from any variety of tuna species. “There was no amplifiable tuna DNA in the sample, so we did not get DNA amplification products and solutions … For that reason, we can’t detect the species,” the scientists defined.

A spokesperson for the laboratory clarifies that there are two chances of explanations, the to start with that the tuna is “far too” processed so that they have not been in a position to make an identification and the other, and easier, is not tuna.

It is vital to take note that a equivalent exam was carried out in February by Inside of Version , the medium collected samples from the chain’s dining establishments, but this time situated in New York, and without a doubt, the laboratory in charge confirmed that the samples have been of tuna.

What do you think about this?